Andrei Kuzminov

Andrei Kuzminov

kuzminov@illinois.edu

C326 CLSL
Office: (217) 265-0329
Lab: (217) 265-0852

Mail to: B103 CLSL

Professor of Microbiology

Research Topics

DNA Biology, Genetics, Genomics, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Microbial Physiology

Education

M.A. (Biochemistry) University of Novosibirsk, Russia, 1985
Ph.D. (Molecular Biology) Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia, 1990
Postdoctoral (Molecular Genetics) Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, 1991-2000

Teaching Interests

Mechanisms of DNA replication stress and genome instability

We are broadly interested in the phenomenon of Chromosome Death, — with the final objective of killing undesirable cells by undermining their genetic material. Specifically, we are interested in the chromosome lesions (DNA lesions that block the chromosome cycle), their formation, repair and misrepair (or inability to repair). We do our studies in E. coli, but other potentially interesting microorganisms, like Deinococcus radiodurans, are always a possibility.

Thymineless death (TLD)

Cells unable to synthesize thymidine (dT) die without thymidine supplementation. Since the bulk of dT resides in the chromosomal DNA, TLD was always considered a chromosome replication phenomenon. In particular, non-replicating (stationary) cells are resistant to TLD, so T-starvation was naturally assumed to specifically target replication forks. Various models were proposed to explain how problems at inhibited replication forks might eventually turn deadly for the chromosome.

We have recently found that cells with demonstrably no replication in their chromosomes, but otherwise normal metabolism, are fully sensitive to TLD, indicating a very different mechanism of cell killing. We have also discovered a substantial pool of low-molecular weight (LMW) dT in the cell. We are trying to figure out:
— The composition of this LMW-dT pool;
— The main enzymes pumping free dT into it, as well as out of it;
— The major processes (besides DNA replication) that tap into this LMW-dT pool.

In the mutants unable to recruit free dT from this LMW-dT pool, we observe dT-hyperstarvation, reflected in the unusually fast thymineless death, which is associated with two additional striking phenomena:
1) rapid loss of the chromosomal DNA, again independently of its replication;
2) severe cytoplasm instability and/or cell envelope disintegration.

This means that, in addition to chromosomal DNA replication (and integrity, as it turns out), dT is also used to support cytoplasm or envelope integrity. We are working on figuring out whether the chromosomal problems in this mutant during dT-starvation develop independently, precede or are caused by the cytoplasm/envelope problems.

In general, identification of the considerable LMW-dT pool inside the cell revealed the second dimension of the thymineless death phenomenon, with multiple future research venues.

Our publications on thymineless death

Khan S.R. and Kuzminov A. (2019) Thymineless death in Escherichia coli is unaffected by the chromosomal replication complexity. J. Bacteriol. 209: e00797-18. PMID: 30745374

Rao, TVP and Kuzminov A (2019) Sources of thymidine and analogs fueling futile damage-repair cycles and ss-gap accumulation during thymine starvation in Escherichia coli. DNA Repair, 75: 1-17. PMID: 30684682

Kuong K.J and Kuzminov A. (2012) Disintegration of nascent replication bubbles during thymine starvation triggers RecA- and RecBCD-dependent replication origin destruction. J. Biol. Chem., 287: 23958-23970. PMID: 22621921

Kuong K.J. and Kuzminov A. (2010) Stalled replication fork repair and misrepair during thymineless death in Escherichia coli. Genes-to-Cells, 15: 619–634. PMID: 20465561

Oxidative DNA damage

Hydrogen peroxide (HP) is an unusual molecule in that it is inert against typical organic molecules, like proteins or nucleic acids (and is stable in plastic containers for years), but at the same time kills any kind of cell on contact. Its extreme life-directed reactivity is explained by transition metals, especially iron, which are always present in cells and readily donate electrons to HP. The extra electrons split HP molecule, generating hydroxyl radicals, — the most reactive chemicals that could be made inside the cell. This is exactly how HP is used by our leukocytes to kill invading microbes.

Remarkably, the concentration of HP inside the phagosomes is four orders of magnitude lower that the killing HP concentrations we have to use in bacterial cultures. The "killing in culture" HP concentrations have to be high because bacterial cells have powerful scavenging capacities against HP. How these HP scavenging capacities are neutralized by our leukocytes remains a big puzzle.

One phenomenon that partially explains the puzzling efficiency of the extremely low HP concentrations in vivo is potentiation of HP toxicity by co-treatment with other simple chemicals, like nitric oxide (NO). Leukocytes are known to pump NO into the phagosome, but the exact mechanisms of how HP+NO treatment kills bacterial cells is not known. One intriguing discovery that we have made in HP+NO-treated bacteria is the so-called "catastrophic chromosome fragmentation", when the bacterial chromosome suffers 100-1,000 double-strand DNA breaks and is rapidly degraded as a result.

Our major questions in this project are:
— What is the nature of these multiple HP+NO-induced double-strand DNA breaks?
— What is the source of reduced iron to generate enough hydroxyl radicals for catastrophic chromosome fragmentation?
— Is there any inhibition of HP scavenging involved?
— What is the specific role of NO in both iron recruitment and in inhibition of HP scavenging?
— Are there any other treatments (simple chemicals, ambient conditions) that synergize with HP treatment?

Our current results allow us to be optimistic about eventually being able to explain the dramatic differences between the bactericidal HP concentrations in cell cultures versus phagosomes of leukocytes.

Our publications on oxidative DNA damage

Mahaseth T. and Kuzminov A. (2017) Potentiation of hydrogen peroxide toxicity: From catalase inhibition to stable DNA-iron complexes. Mutat. Res.: Rev. Mutat. Res., 773: 274-281. PMID: 28927535

Mahaseth T. and Kuzminov A. (2016) Prompt repair of hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA lesions prevents catastrophic chromosomal fragmentation. DNA Repair, 41: 42-53. PMID: 27078578

Mahaseth T. and Kuzminov A. (2015) Cyanide enhances hydrogen peroxide toxicity by recruiting endogenous iron to trigger catastrophic chromosomal fragmentation. Mol. Microbiol., 96: 349-367. PMID: 25598241

RNA-containing chromosomal lesions (R-lesions)

The main contamination of DNA turns out to be RNA, and not only single ribonucleotides misincorporated in the DNA chains, but also RNA transcripts that hybridize back with their genes, forming D-loops that have no covalent linkages to DNA chains. The cell does not tolerate either type of RNA presence in the DNA, removing RNA residues with specialized enzymes, RNases H. Every cell has a dedicated RNase H to remove single DNA-rNs, as well as (usually) another dedicated RNase H to remove R-loops. Although the two RNase H substrates are very different, and single mutants in one or the other RNase H display no or modest growth defects, the mutant lacking both enzymes is grossly inhibited. The reason for this synergy between the two RNase H defects is currently unknown. We have found that the double RNase H-deficient mutants form filamentous cells filled with DNA and depend on recombinational repair, suggesting formation of chromosomal lesions and the inability to repair some of them faithfully. The nature of these so-called R-lesions is completely unknown, although it is clear that they start with formation of R-loops.

We have speculated that these chromosomal lesions could be R-tracts (DNA duplexes with extended ribonucleotide runs, incorporated in one of the strands). However, currently we are unable to detect these R-tracts in the genomic DNA of the RNase H-deficient mutants. There could be two explanations for our frustration: 1) there are too few of R-tracts per chromosome, so our detection protocols simply lack sensitivity; 2) the R-lesions are not R-tracts, but something else. We address the challenge of R-lesion detection with two complementary approaches: 1) by screening for mutants that depend on the RNase H for viability (so-called "synthetic lethals" with RNase H inactivation); 2) by finding treatments that kill RNase H-deficient mutants. In both cases, we hope to find conditions (either genetic defects or treatments) that amplify R-lesions, — which will facilitate their detection. In other words, under these conditions, we should either start detecting R-tracts or should detect something else that kills RNase H mutants, — revealing alternative R-lesions.

Our publications on R-lesions

Kouzminova EA, Kadyrov FF and Kuzminov A. (2017) RNase HII saves rnhA mutant Escherichia coli from R-loop-associated chromosomal fragmentation. J. Mol. Biol. 429: 2873-2894. PMID: 28821455

Replication intermediates

Inactivation of DNA ligase preserves the original size of replication intermediates in vivo (by preventing their maturation into the full-length chromosomal DNA), but excision repair breaks replication intermediates into smaller pieces. For many years, this post-replication breakage confused in vivo researchers into thinking that both the leading and the lagging strand are synthesized in similar-size pieces (Okazaki fragments). Recently, we have inactivated all known excision repair activities in the E. coli ligA mutant and found the true size of replication intermediates: they are indeed small on the lagging strand (~ 1 kb), but much longer on the leading strand (~50 kb), although still requiring periodic re-priming.

Our newly-developed ability to separate the leading strand RIs from the lagging strand RIs opens up possibilities to explore the regulation of either species, separately. For example, we are in a position to ask what determines the frequency of the periodic re-priming on the leading strand, testing such mutants or conditions as: 1) replication-blocking DNA lesions; 2) defects or overproduction of the major nucleoid-associated proteins; 3) topoisomerase defects; 4) the copy number of primase. We are also planning to inquire into what determines the cadence of primase on the lagging strand, by measuring the length of Okazaki fragments in: 1) the various primase mutants, as well as under- and over-expressing constructs; 2) mutants in single-strand DNA-binding (SSB) protein; 3) mutants in the HolC and HolD subunits of the replisome, which are considered to be responsible for managing SSB on the single-strand DNA at the replication fork. Replication intermediates in vivo may finally yield their mechanistic secrets!

Our publications on replication intermediates

Cronan GE, Kouzminova EA and Kuzminov A. (2019) Near-continuously synthesized leading strands in Escherichia coli are broken by ribonucleotide excision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116: 1251-1260. PMID: 30617079

Amado L. and Kuzminov A. (2013) Low-molecular-weight DNA replication intermediates in Escherichia coli: mechanism of formation and strand specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 425: 4177-4191. PMID: 23876705

Amado L. and Kuzminov A. (2006) The replication intermediates in Escherichia coli are not the product of DNA processing or uracil excision. J. Biol. Chem., 281: 22635-22646. PMID: 16772291